This awareness that no new data exists is referred to as theoretical saturation. Once he realizes that he has collected all the data, and no new data exists within the sample, he moves on to a new sample. The researcher begins with a single sample where he tries to gather information. Unlike in most cases where the researcher has a specific sample, in grounded theory, this is not the case. Sampling in grounded theory is a bit different to the conventional methods. The foundation for new theories lies in these categories. Once these have been identified the researcher can create codes, concepts, and categories. A researcher needs to develop theoretical sensitivity to understand the variables, relationships in data.
Once the data has been collected, he identifies the patterns in data. The researcher enters the field with an open mind and allows the data to guide him. However, in the grounded theory, it is not the case. In many of the research methodologies, the researcher creates a research problem and investigates with a prevailing theoretical framework in mind. The specialty in this theory is that the theory emerges from within the data. Grounded theory is a methodology developed by Barney Glaser and Anslem Strauss. Through this article let us examine the differences between Grounded Theory and Phenomenology. Phenomenology, on the other hand, is not merely a methodology but also a philosophy that pays attention to the subjective realities of people and their interpretations. Grounded theory specifically refers to a methodology used by many researchers. Grounded theory and phenomenology are both methodologies used in the social sciences. Grounded Theory and Phenomenology are two methodologies used in the social sciences, between which some differences can be identified.
0 kommentar(er)
